Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40369511›Full record

ArticleBMC complementary medicine and therapies2025

Advancing human-use experience for real-world evidence for the registration of traditional Chinese medicine products in China.

Mingge Xia, Yan Xue, Luwei Zhu, Xianwen Chen, Carolina Oi Lam Ung, Sheng Han, Yunfeng Lai, Hao Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mingge XiaState Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences, University of Macau, Taipa, Macao.
Yan XueState Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences, University of Macau, Taipa, Macao.
Luwei ZhuDepartment of Medical Insurance, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Xianwen ChenState Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences, University of Macau, Taipa, Macao.
Carolina Oi Lam UngState Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences, University of Macau, Taipa, Macao.
Sheng HanDepartment of Pharmacy Administration and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Yunfeng LaiSchool of Public Health and Management, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China. yunfeng.lai@hotmail.com.
Hao HuState Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences, University of Macau, Taipa, Macao. haohu@um.edu.mo.

Funding

the Science and Technology Development Fund, Macau SAR (FDCT) 005/2023/SKLUniversity of Macau MYRG-GRG2023-00059-ICMS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe registration application of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) products as new drugs often meets the challenges of lacking clinical evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCT). In recent years, China has introduced a new evidence system for the review and approval of TCM products, which proposed using human-use experience (HUE) for real-world evidence (RWE) to support the safety and effectiveness of TCM. PURPOSE: This study aimed to comprehensively analyse the regulatory concerns, policy guidances, and approved cases of using HUE to register TCM products.

methodsLiterature search and thematic analysis were conducted to identify and synthesize the regulatory concerns. A documentary analysis of policy guidances was employed to present the evolving regulatory framework for incorporating HUE into TCM registration in China. Case studies of approved TCM products using HUE to support registration were conducted, and the study design, study population, and postmarked requirements of these cases were analyzed.

resultsFour main themes and 12 sub-themes regarding regulatory concerns of applying HUE in the registration of TCM products were identified. The 4 main themes are HUE quality, HUE applicability, HUE governance, and HUE regulation. Six policy documents and seven technical guidances were released to facilitate the application of HUE in TCM registration, founding a practical regulatory framework for TCM product registration. In China, six cases that employed HUE to support registration were approved. Of these, five cases utilized HUE to support direct registration, while one utilized HUE to lay the foundation for subsequent phase III clinical trial. Regarding study design and data types, retrospective observational studies were the predominant approach and electronic health records from the hospital information systems were the most commonly used data source. Among the five cases of direct registration, three relied solely on retrospective observational studies, while two conducted small-sample prospective studies in conjunction with retrospective observational studies.

conclusionHUE can be advanced to generate RWE for the safety and effectiveness of TCM products, which provides potential support for registering new TCM products. Leveraging HUE for registration can shorten research and development period, reduce development costs, and promote innovation, ultimately driving the growth of the TCM industry. However, several challenges remain in using HUE to support the registration of TCM products in China, including difficulties in data accessibility, lack of standardized protocols for HUE collection and reporting, and obstacles in transforming TCM preparations from hospitals into new TCM products using HUE. Furthermore, ensuring high-quality HUE requires future attention to data applicability, data infrastructure, and research design.

Indexed as

Drug ApprovalDrugs, Chinese HerbalMedicine, Chinese TraditionalChinaHumansRegistriesDrugs, Chinese HerbalHuman-use experienceReal-world evidenceRegulatory decisionTraditional Chinese medicine

Identifiers

PMID40369511
PMCPMC12077040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.