ArticleBMC surgery2025
Comparative analysis of hysterectomy types and approaches on oncological survival in 2023 FIGO stage II endometrial carcinoma.
Article in BMC surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe objective is to investigate the relationship between the type and approaches of hysterectomy and the oncological survival outcomes in women diagnosed with stage II endometrial carcinoma (EC), as classified by the 2023 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with 2009 FIGO early-stage (stages I and II) EC who underwent surgical treatment between 2018 and 2019. These patients were reclassified in accordance with the 2023 FIGO staging system, and those diagnosed with stage II EC under this system were selected as the study population. A non-inferiority test was employed for the analysis, with disease-free survival (DFS) serving as the primary outcome measure. DFS was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves, and comparisons were conducted through the log-rank test.
resultA cohort of 288 patients diagnosed with early-stage EC according to the 2009 FIGO staging system were re-evaluated and reclassified. Ultimately, the study encompassed a cohort of 80 patients diagnosed with stage II EC, as classified according to the 2023 FIGO staging system. 52 individuals underwent radical hysterectomy or modified radical hysterectomy (RH/mRH), while 28 patients received a simple hysterectomy (SH). The 5-year DFS was 84.62% for the RH/mRH group vs. 92.86% for the SH group (difference, 8.24% [95% CI, -5.44-21.92%]), which met the noninferiority criterion. Between the groups, the difference in 5-year DFS (p = 0.255) was not statistically significant. The laparoscope group comprised 62 cases, whereas the laparotomy group consisted of 18 cases. Between the groups, the difference in 5-year DFS (88.55% versus 83.33%, p = 0.538) was not statistically significant. This finding aligns with our observations of patients diagnosed with 2009 FIGO Stage II EC.
conclusionIn comparison to SH, RH/mRH did not confer a survival advantage for patients diagnosed with 2023 FIGO stage II EC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.