ArticleBMC public health2025
Healthy lifestyle promote Chinese university students' well-being: a cross-sectional network analysis.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lifestyle Behaviors and their association with self-rated health among university students in Spain: A cross-sectional study.Preventive medicine reports · 2026Article
- Unraveling links between lifestyle behaviors and depressive symptoms: a network analysis using NHANES 2007-2018 data.Annals of general psychiatry · 2026Article
- The interaction between future food considerations, regulation of eating behaviors, sense of purpose, and social media consciousness among college students: a study on mediation effects and network analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- A Cluster Analysis of EPOCH Questionnaire Data from University Students in Sichuan, China: Exploring Group Differences in Psychological Well-Being and Demographic Factors.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrevious studies have revealed associations between lifestyle factors and well-being. However, few studies have examined these relationships within a network framework that accounts for their interconnections. The present study utilized network analysis to explore the promoting and inhibiting effects of various lifestyle behaviors on well-being.
methodsUsing convenience sampling, we surveyed 1,542 college students from seven universities in southern China between July and August 2023. We employed a network model to examine the structure of restorative behaviors (healthy eating and physical activity), deteriorative behaviors (alcohol consumption, cigarette use, and screen time), and well-being (psychological, social, and emotional well-being). This study explored the protective and risk effects of various restorative and deteriorative behaviors on well-being.
resultsThe results revealed that healthy eating was positively associated with psychological well-being (PWB; edge weight = 0.14), social well-being (SWB; edge weight = 0.05), and emotional well-being (EWB; edge weight = 0.09); physical activity was positively associated with PWB (edge weight = 0.04), and SWB (edge weight = 0.04); screen time was negatively associated with SWB (edge weight = -0.04). Healthy eating (bridge expected influence = 1.48) was identified as essential bridge nodes in maintaining the structure of the network.
conclusionsThe present study offered a new perspective on the relationship between lifestyle behaviors and well-being using network analysis for the first time. These findings offer preliminary insights for public health strategies aimed at improving students' well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.