ArticleBMC primary care2025
Introducing colon capsule endoscopy as a new diagnostic modality for patients with bowel symptoms in general practice: a feasibility study.
Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBowel symptoms are common in general practice and though most often benign they can also indicate colorectal cancer where a colonoscopy often is required to rule out malignant disease. Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) is suggested as a more patient-friendly alternative to colonoscopy but its application in symptomatic patients in general practice needs further investigation. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe present a feasibility study of integrating initial triage for CCE into general practice. The technical success of CCE, patient acceptance, and the experiences of general practitioners (GPs) are assessed through qualitative interviews with participating GPs.
resultsWe were able to recruit some general practices from the area of interest, but inclusion of patients was low. The participating GPs welcomed the concept of CCE as a more patient-friendly procedure and most patients invited by the GP accepted inclusion. Difficulties remembering the project in the diverse everyday of general practice, GP shortage and general time restraints were reported as barriers for patient recruitment by the GPs.
conclusionBefore conducting large-scale implementation studies of CCE, our investigation highlighted critical barriers that need addressing: (1) Time Constraints and GP Shortages: The design of task divisions between sectors should carefully consider time limitations and the scarcity of GPs. (2) Low reinvestigation rates: Minimizing reinvestigation rates is crucial to reduce strain on both patients and healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.