Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40369423›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2025

Reflections of rural primary care physicians on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study.

Mary F Henningfield, Keelin McHugh, Sarina Schrager

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mary F HenningfieldThe Wisconsin Research and Education Network (WREN), Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA. Mary.Henningfield@fammed.wisc.edu.
Keelin McHughThe Wisconsin Research and Education Network (WREN), Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Sarina SchragerThe Wisconsin Research and Education Network (WREN), Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRural physicians tend to develop deep relationships with their patients and communities; however, few studies have evaluated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on relationships of physicians working in rural primary care clinics. We aimed to collect reflections of primary care physicians to understand their experiences during the pandemic and the impact on their relationships with patients, other physicians, clinic staff, and their communities.

methodsInterviews with primary care physicians practicing in rural Wisconsin used open-ended questions about experiences during the pandemic and the impact of the pandemic on their work and relationships, coping and well-being, and resources of their rural clinics. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and de-identified for thematic qualitative analysis.

resultsTwelve physicians were interviewed between October 3, 2022 and April 7, 2023. Experiences varied by the phase of the pandemic, especially changes in the work of physicians (e.g., working in the hospital), adapting to telemedicine, implementing mitigation strategies, and addressing vaccine hesitancy. These experiences impacted physicians' relationships with patients and their communities, especially when addressing vaccine hesitancy, mitigation strategies (e.g., masking), and misinformation. Some relationships were strengthened by shared experiences, such as clinic staff working together to meet challenges. Other relationships, however, were strained by social distancing and many physicians reported a loss of camaraderie with colleagues attributed to isolation and virtual meetings replacing in-person activities. Challenges for rural clinics included lack of resources (e.g., staff shortages), limited broadband access, and difficulties transferring patients to tertiary care centers.

conclusionsPhysicians working in rural primary care clinics described a myriad of experiences during the pandemic. Difficulties in addressing vaccine hesitancy and misinformation about the pandemic were consistently identified as negatively affecting relationships with patients and some staff. Fewer in-person interactions with colleagues negatively impacted relationships, although the ability to connect with others through virtual methods was viewed positively. Future work could address the loss of collegiality and increasing isolation among clinicians attributed to continued use of virtual tools and increased remote work.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCOVID-19Physicians, Primary CareRural Health ServicesAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsPhysician-Patient RelationsPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2TelemedicineCliniciansCOVID-19 pandemicFamily medicineRural medicine

Identifiers

PMID40369423
PMCPMC12077029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.