Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40369412›Full record

SynthesisBMC gastroenterology2025

Comparison of outcomes between surgery and non-surgery after conversion therapy for advanced gastric cancer with unresectable factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jiaheng Wu, Xuetian Du, Yiqiang He, Shulin Xian

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisComparative Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jiaheng WuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Xuetian DuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Yiqiang HeDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangxi Nationalities Hospital, Guangxi, China.
Shulin XianDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China. xian83711111@163.com.

Funding

Hubei Chen Xiaoping Science and Technology Development Foundation CXPJJH121001-2021074
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvanced gastric cancer (AGC) with unresectable factors presents a significant treatment challenge. Conventional treatments such as systemic chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy can delay disease progression but often yield limited outcomes. For stage III-IV gastric cancer with unresectable factors, conversion therapy based on chemotherapy can achieve tumor downstaging, providing a subset of patients with the opportunity for curative surgery. However, the efficacy of multimodal approaches combining chemotherapy, with or without immunotherapy, and conversion surgery compared to chemotherapy alone remains controversial.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of high-quality studies published between January 2014 and November 2024, assessing the role of surgery following conversion therapy in advanced gastric cancer. Relevant studies were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. All included studies were observational; no randomized trials were available. Clinical data, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and adverse event (AE) rates, were analyzed using RevMan 5.4.

resultsTwelve observational cohort studies were included. Conversion surgery(CS) was associated with improved 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS rates (RR 0.38, 95% CI: 0.31-0.47; RR 0.64, 95% CI: 0.54-0.76; RR 0.77, 95% CI: 0.65-0.91, respectively) and increased 1-year and 3-year PFS rates (RR 0.57, 95% CI: 0.49-0.99; RR 0.67, 95% CI: 0.57-0.78, respectively). No significant difference in AE rates was observed between groups.

conclusionsConversion surgery following chemotherapy in stage III-IV gastric cancer is associated with improved OS and PFS in observational studies. However, these findings may reflect inherent prognostic differences between groups, as surgery was only feasible for chemotherapy responders. Prospective trials are needed to validate causality.

Indexed as

GastrectomyStomach NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyHumansNeoplasm StagingObservational Studies as TopicProgression-Free SurvivalTreatment OutcomeAdvanced gastric cancerConversion surgeryDisease-free survivalOverall survival

Identifiers

PMID40369412
PMCPMC12080213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.