ArticleMolecular imaging and biology2025
[18 F]-Fluoroestradiol PET (FES-PET) and [18 F] Flurodeoxyglucose PET (FDG-PET) Imaging May Aid in Managing Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Lobular Breast Cancer.
Article in Molecular imaging and biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- ESR Innovation in Focus: Future PET radiotracers in oncology.European radiology · 2026Article
- Response-adaptive breast cancer care in the grey zones: integrating ER and HER2 targeted PET, FDG PET/CT under immunotherapy, and ctDNA kinetics.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimThis study examines the combination of FES-PET and FDG-PET as complementary imaging for detection of metastatic ILC.
methodsWe retrospectively evaluated FES and FDG uptake in patients with metastatic ILC from an estrogen receptor (ER) positive primary tumor. We classified lesions into three categories (FES high/FDG low, FES high/FDG high, FES low/FDG low) using SUVmax cut-off values of 1.5 for FES and 5.0 for FDG. Qualitative evaluation included examination of the difference in the extent of disease between FES and FDG.
resultsOf the 38 patients, 82% had FES uptake in all tumor sites identified by FDG, with 18% lacking FES uptake in at least one lesion. Mean (range) SUVmax for FES and FDG was 4.0 (0.67-10.6) and 4.6 (1.3-12.5), respectively. The majority of ILC patients (25/38), had lesions with FES high/FDG low uptake, consistent with the strongly ER + indolent nature of ILC. Patients with disease classified as FES high/FDG low had longer median overall survival (OS) (3.2 years) and progression-free survival (PFS) (1.5 years) than FES high/FDG high (OS = 2.1 years and PFS = 0.46 years). The median overall OS for all patients was 3.0 years (95% CI 2.5, 4.8) and PFS of 1.3 years (95% CI 0.6, 2.5). 8 patients (21%) had qualitatively more extensive disease by FES-PET.
conclusionsOur findings suggest that both FES-PET and FDG-PET can identify metastatic ILC and be useful in detecting the pattern and extent of disease. The imaging combination provides additional information for prognosis and clinical decision making, balancing suitability for endocrine therapy and aggressiveness/indolence of disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.