Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40369364›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2025

Binaural-cue reweighting induced by discrimination training.

Maike Klingel, Udbhav Singhal, Aaron R Seitz, Norbert Kopčo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maike KlingelAcoustics Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
Udbhav SinghalPavol Jozef Šafárik University, Košice, Slovakia.
Aaron R SeitzNortheastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Norbert KopčoPavol Jozef Šafárik University, Košice, Slovakia. norbert.kopco@upjs.sk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When localizing sounds, listeners combine the two binaural cues interaural time and level difference (ITD and ILD). The relative weight assigned to each cue is frequency dependent, with ITDs dominating at low and ILDs at high frequencies. However, this weighting changes (e.g., depending on room reverberation or cue reliability). To achieve better spatial hearing in various listener populations, changing the weighting might be advantageous. Previous studies showed that such changes can be induced (e.g., using a lateralization training with visual reinforcement in virtual reality). Here, a new training procedure is introduced, based on a simple auditory-only discrimination task. An experiment evaluated the procedure, consisting of a pretest, three training sessions, and a posttest. Subjects were divided into three groups-one trained by reinforcing the ILDs, one by reinforcing the ITDs, and one no-training control. The training consisted of an adaptive staircase of relative discrimination trials. Stimuli were two consecutive narrow-band noise bursts (2-4 kHz), each presented with a different combination of ITD and ILD. Participants' task was to indicate the perceived location of the second noise burst versus the first. During training, feedback was provided requiring the subject to imagine the sound moving in the trained cue's direction. We observed an increase in reinforced-cue weight for both training groups, but not in the control group, that continued during all three training sessions. Thus, this training method is effective for reweighting in both directions. Moreover, it is individualized, and, since it does not rely on sophisticated equipment, it can be easily accessible for a range of listeners.

Indexed as

CuesDiscrimination LearningDiscrimination, PsychologicalSound LocalizationAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultBinaural-cue reweightingInteraural level differenceInteraural time differenceSignal detection theory modellingSpatial hearingTrading ratio

Identifiers

PMID40369364
PMCPMC12204945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.