ArticleScientific reports2025
Robust hierarchical co-clustering for exploring toxicogenomic biomarkers and their chemical regulators.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI/ML-based computational models for toxicity prediction.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2026Review
- Genome-wide bioinformatics analysis of the MATE gene family for abiotic stress tolerance in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.).PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Toxicity measurement of doses of chemicals (DCs) is one of the most important tasks in toxicology studies and the drug discovery and development process. In this issue, toxicogenomic biomarkers are now playing a vital role in measuring the toxicity of DCs. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between DCs-treatment and control groups are considered toxicogenomic biomarkers, and associated chemicals are the regulators of DEGs. The co-clustering technique is now used extensively in toxicogenomic research to investigate co-clusters between genomic biomarkers and their chemical regulators. In the literature, there are few approaches to exploring co-clusters. The hierarchical co-clustering (HCoClust) approach is faster, simpler, and more flexible. Nevertheless, it is not robust against outlier data and there is no instruction about separating upregulatory or downregulatory co-clusters, a crucial goal of toxicogenomic data analysis. Therefore, in this article, we proposed a robust HCoClust (rHCoClust) approach and developed an r-package called "rhcoclust" for its implementation. Simulation results showed that the conventional HCoClust and the proposed rHCoClust performed equally well in detecting co-clusters in the absence of outliers, while rHCoClust performed much better than HCoClust in the presence of outliers. However, rHCoClust outperformed the bi-clustering approaches in detecting co-clusters, since bi-clustering methods only work when row and column clusters are equal, and they have no criterion for detecting upregulatory and downregulatory co-clusters. Then rHCoClust was compared with HCoClust through real data analysis and found that rHCoClust performed better than HCoClust. In the case of real data analysis, the proposed method rHCoClust identified top-ranked two DEGs-clusters (GSTA5, MGST2, GCLC, GCLM, G6PD) and (EHHADH, CYP4A1, ANGPT14, CPT1A) that were significantly expressed by the influence of top-ranked two DCs-clusters (acetaminophen_High _24.hr, nitrofurazone_High_24.hr, methapyrilene_High_24.hr) and (WY.14643_High_24.hr, clofibrate_High_24.hr, gemfibrozil_High_24.hr, benzbromarone_High_24.hr, aspirin_High_24.hr) through the glutathione metabolism (GMP) and PPAR signaling pathway (PPAR-SP) respectively. The literature review also supported these results. Thus, the proposed method would be useful to explore toxicogenomic biomarkers and their chemical regulators from the robustness point of view.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.