ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2025
Targeting the glioblastoma resection margin with locoregional nanotechnologies.
Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single-cell transcriptome-guided biomimetic magnetothermal hydrogel microspheres for multimodal eradication of residual glioblastoma.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Bufalin-Loaded Multifunctional Nanodrugs for Cancer Therapy: Mechanisms, Delivery Strategies, and Translational Perspectives.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- The Invasive Margin of Glioblastoma as a Molecular Ecosystem: Spatial Heterogeneity, Tumor-Host Interactions, and Therapeutic Opportunities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- On the Edge of Benefit and Harm: Reactive Oxygen Species in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Article
- MET-mediated phosphorylation of YANK2 at Y282 inhibits NEDD4L-dependent SUMOylation and degradation, promoting chemoresistance in glioblastoma.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Article
- Localized co-delivery of in-situ hydrogel containing ibrutinib-PLGA-PEG-folate nanoparticle and octreotide microsphere to glioblastoma.Drug delivery and translational research · 2026Article
- A multifunctional injectable MPDA@MTIC-Co hydrogel platform for synergistic chemotherapy-photothermal therapy of postoperative glioblastoma.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Overcoming blood-brain barrier and chemoresistance in glioblastoma by Angiopep-2-modified NK cell-derived extracellular vesicles for targeted delivery of temozolomide.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- Design of prodrugs with reactive oxygen species as activators and their application in tumor therapy.Theranostics · 2026Review
- 3D bioprinted microneedle patches loaded with gambogic acid-iron-doxorubicin nanozymes for postoperative glioma in situ therapy via ferroptosis synergistic chemosensitization.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Article
- Localized treatment of glioblastoma: a review of clinical strategies and advances in drug delivery systems.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surgical resection is the first stage of treatment for patients diagnosed with resectable glioblastoma and is followed by a combination of adjuvant radiotherapy and systemic single-agent chemotherapy, which is typically commenced 4-6 weeks after surgery. This delay creates an interval during which residual tumour cells residing in the resection margin can undergo uninhibited proliferation and further invasion, even immediately after surgery, thus limiting the effectiveness of adjuvant therapies. Recognition of the postsurgical resection margin and peri-marginal zones as important anatomical clinical targets and the need to rethink current strategies can galvanize opportunities for local, intraoperative approaches, while also generating a new landscape of innovative treatment modalities. In this Perspective, we discuss opportunities and challenges for developing locoregional therapeutic strategies to target the glioblastoma resection margin as well as emerging opportunities offered by nanotechnology in this clinically transformative setting. We also discuss how persistent barriers to clinical translation can be overcome to offer a potential path forward towards broader acceptability of such advanced technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40369318What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.