Trial reportInternational journal of colorectal disease2025
Short-course versus long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer: long-term results of a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in International journal of colorectal disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neoadjuvant therapy for pMMR/MSS locally advanced rectal cancer in the immunotherapy era: current landscape and future perspectives.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeShort-course radiotherapy (SCRT) and long-course radiotherapy (LCRT) are the primary neoadjuvant radiotherapy schedules for locally advanced rectal cancer. Recent research has questioned the efficacy of SCRT. This study presents an updated analysis of our previous research, extending the follow-up to evaluate 5-year outcomes by comparing the long-term results of these two strategies. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis randomized controlled trial compared SCRT and LCRT in locally advanced middle or high rectal adenocarcinoma. The SCRT group received 25 Gy/5 fractions over 1 week plus CAPOX, while the LCRT group received 50-50.4 Gy/25-28 fractions over 5-5.5 weeks plus capecitabine. All patients received consolidation chemotherapy and then underwent delayed surgery after 8 weeks or more post-radiotherapy. The endpoints of this updated analysis include overall survival (OS),disease-free survival (DFS), locoregional recurrence (LR) and distant metastasis (DM).
resultsNinety-nine cases (45 LCRT, 54 SCRT) were followed for a median of 4.7 years. Five-year OS rates were 77.3% for LCRT vs. 65.6% for SCRT group (P = 0.4). The 5-year DFS rates were 69.6% for LCRT vs. 54.9% for SCRT (P = 0.07). Cox regression indicated no prominent difference between the two groups regarding OS, LR, or DM. Subgroup analysis demonstrated a significantly better DFS with LCRT compared to SCRT in male patients ([HR] = 2.48, 95%CI: 1.04-5.93, P = 0.03), patients under the age of 60 (HR = 3.19, 95%CI: 1.03-9.92, P = 0.04), and cT4 patients (HR not calculated: no events in LCRT group, P = 0.004).
conclusionDFS showed a trend in favor of the LCRT group, with LCRT being significantly superior among men, patients under 60, and cT4 stage. Despite being intensified, SCRT failed to achieve long-term outcomes comparable to LCRT. Further research is needed to compare these two approaches in the context of total neoadjuvant treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATA: IRCT2017110424266N3 (Registration date: 2017-11-12). https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir/trial/20526 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.