ArticleEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2025
Predicting 5-year-olds mental health at birth: development and internal validation of a multivariable model using the prospective ELFE birth cohort.
Article in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We developed and internally validated a multivariable model to be used in the perinatal period, to predict 5-year-olds mental health, using the ELFE prospective French multicentre birth cohort (n=9768). Twenty-six candidate predictors were used, spanning pre-pregnancy maternal health, pregnancy-specific-experiences, birth factors and sociodemographic risk (maternal age, education, relationship, migrancy and family income). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire total score at 5-years, dichotomised at the recommended cut-off (16), was the outcome. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selector Operator followed by bootstrapping was used. High and low-risk was classified by ≥8% risk-threshold score. Stability of the model at population- and individual-level and model performance across groups of interest (sex, sociodemographic risk and neonatal intensive care admissions) was also examined. 10 variables (total number pregnancy-specific experiences, sociodemographic risk, maternal pre-existing hypertension and psychological difficulties, gravidity, maternal mental health problems in a previous pregnancy, smoking and alcohol use in current pregnancy, how labour started and infant sex) with a C-statistic of 0.67; 95%CI (0.64-0.69) predicted mental health. The positive and negative predictive value were 12% & 95.4% respectively, leading to 78.8% of children correctly classified. Model performance was similar across groups of interest but increased for children (born ≥33-weeks-gestation) with neonatal admissions (AUC 0.78; 95%CI (0.69-0.87)). This model is most useful for identifying low-risk children. Applying this model in a tiered preventative intervention framework could be beneficial with those predicted to be high-risk receiving further screening to determine the level of intervention required. External validation and implementation research are required before considering its use in practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.