ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
Performing robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for patients with a narrow mediastinum and left-shifted esophagus for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma presents further challenges.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical advantage of robot-assisted over conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy in patients with a narrow mediastinum.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Fusion surgery in robot-assisted esophagectomy: stepwise learning curves across the da Vinci™ and hinotori™ platforms.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Advances in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy-An Overview of Recent Developments and a Novel Classification of Innovations in Treatment of Thoracic Esophageal Cancer.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSeveral studies have compared robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) with conventional minimally invasive surgery (C-MIE). However, the anatomical factors that may make certain patients more suitable for RAMIE remains unclear. This study compared the surgical outcomes of RAMIE with those of C-MIE in patients with narrow mediastinum and left-shifted esophagus.
methodsBetween January 2017 and December 2023, 260 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who underwent MIE (C-MIE or RAMIE) at Kobe University Hospital were included in the study. We developed a new index to assess the narrow mediastinum and left-shifted esophagus at the tracheal bifurcation level using computed tomography imaging. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to identify the prognostic factors.
resultsPatients with a narrow mediastinum and left-shifted esophagus had a higher incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) palsy and fewer lymph nodes dissections than other patients (p = 0.026 and p = 0.051, respectively). In the entire cohort, the operative time in the RAMIE group was longer than that in the C-MIE group (< 0.0001). No significant differences in other variables, including RLN palsy, were observed between the two groups. Among patients with narrow mediastinum and left-shifted esophagus, RAMIE was associated with longer operative time and fewer lymph nodes dissected from the left and right sides of the upper mediastinum compared to C-MIE (p < 0.0001, 0.0001, and 0.0001, respectively). Regarding the RLN palsy, there was no significant difference (p = 0.79).
conclusionsThere are challenges in performing RAMIE in patients with a narrow mediastinal and left-shifted esophagus. Therefore, establishing an effective procedure for these patients is important.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40369282What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.