ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2025
Biological effects of femtosecond and millisecond lasers application for assisted hatching in mouse embryos.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Studying the Safety of Trophectoderm Biopsy Using Visible Femtosecond Laser Pulses.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- The effect of laser-assisted incubation on bovineFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeLaser-assisted hatching (LAH) is a typical procedure in ART. It is used when embryos are unable to hatch. To reduce the potential damage to embryos caused by millisecond laser typically used to create zona pellucida openings, we have developed a protocol for femtosecond laser microsurgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the possible effects of the femtosecond laser, as opposed to the millisecond dissector used in LAH.
methodsZygotes obtained from hormonally stimulated wild-type mice were cultured in vitro until blastocyst stage. Two types of lasers were used to perform LAH: femtosecond and millisecond. The femtosecond laser system used in this study was a TETA ytterbium laser. As a millisecond laser, we used the Octax Laser Shot dissector (pulse duration 5 and 10ms).
resultsTo analyze whether the femtosecond laser could be dangerous for embryos, we evaluated the presence of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and heat-shock proteins (HSP). We found no differences in the production of ROS and in the synthesis of HSP at both the protein and mRNA levels between the negative control and the femtosecond LAH groups, whereas ROS levels in the millisecond LAH group of embryos were close to those observed in the positive control group. Millisecond laser-treated embryos collapsed, while embryos from the femtosecond LAH group did not exhibit such morphological changes.
conclusionsApplication of femtosecond laser for LAH procedure is effective and does not lead to the production of HSP and ROS in embryos.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.