ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2025
A computed tomography-based radiomics prediction model for BRAF mutation status in colorectal cancer.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Radiomics Models as Tools for Predicting Genetic Mutations in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to develop and validate CT venous phase image-based radiomics to predict BRAF gene mutation status in preoperative colorectal cancer patients.
methodsIn this study, 301 patients with pathologically confirmed colorectal cancer were retrospectively enrolled, comprising 225 from Centre I (73 mutant and 152 wild-type) and 76 from Centre II (36 mutant and 40 wild-type). The Centre I cohort was randomly divided into a training set (n = 158) and an internal validation set (n = 67) in a 7:3 ratio, while Centre II served as an independent external validation set (n = 76). The whole tumor region of interest was segmented, and radiomics characteristics were extracted. To explore whether tumor expansion could improve the performance of the study objectives, the tumor contour was extended by 3 mm in this study. Finally, a t-test, Pearson correlation, and LASSO regression were used to screen out features strongly associated with BRAF mutations. Based on these features, six classifiers-Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Logistic Regression (LR), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost)-were constructed. The model performance and clinical utility were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, decision curve analysis, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.
resultsGender was an independent predictor of BRAF mutations. The unexpanded RF model, constructed using 11 imaging histologic features, demonstrated the best predictive performance. For the training cohort, it achieved an AUC of 0.814 (95% CI 0.732-0.895), an accuracy of 0.810, and a sensitivity of 0.620. For the internal validation cohort, it achieved an AUC of 0.798 (95% CI 0.690-0.907), an accuracy of 0.761, and a sensitivity of 0.609. For the external validation cohort, it achieved an AUC of 0.737 (95% CI 0.616-0.847), an accuracy of 0.658, and a sensitivity of 0.667.
conclusionsA machine learning model based on CT radiomics can effectively predict BRAF mutations in patients with colorectal cancer. The unexpanded RF model demonstrated optimal predictive performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.