ReviewNature protocols2025
Tutorial: guidelines for the use of machine learning methods to mine genomes and proteomes for antibiotic discovery.
Review in Nature protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning reveals antimicrobial peptides within prions.Nature microbiology · 2026Article
- CAMPER: mechanistic artificial intelligence for designing peptides that target MRSA persisters.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Article
- Iterative discovery of potent polymeric antibiotics via multi-stage and multi-task learning against antimicrobial resistance.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Harnessing Machine Learning Approaches for the Identification, Characterization, and Optimization of Novel Antimicrobial Peptides.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Detection of antimicrobial peptides from fecal samples of FMT donors using deep learning.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genomes and proteomes constitute a rich reservoir of molecular diversity. However, they have remained underexplored because of a lack of appropriate tools. In recent years, computational approaches have been developed to mine this unexplored biological information, or dark matter, accelerating the discovery of new antibiotic molecules. Such efforts have yielded a wide range of new molecules. These include peptides released via predicted proteolytic cleavage of larger proteins, termed 'encrypted peptides', which have been found to be widespread in nature. Molecules encoded by and translated from small open reading frames within genomic sequences have also been uncovered, further expanding the landscape of bioactive compounds. Here, we discuss computational approaches, including machine learning and artificial intelligence (AI) tools, which have been used to date to identify antimicrobial compounds, with a special emphasis on peptides. We also propose potential avenues for future exploration in this rapidly evolving field. Moreover, we provide an overview of the experimental methods commonly used to validate these computational predictions. We anticipate that efforts combining cutting-edge AI and experimental approaches for biological sequence mining will reveal new insights into host immunity and continue to accelerate discoveries in the fields of antibiotics and infectious diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40369233What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.