ArticleScientific reports2025
A metaheuristic optimization-based approach for accurate prediction and classification of knee osteoarthritis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The role of synovial mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes in cartilage repair: a systematic review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- [Advances in deep learning multimodal fusion for early diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026Review
- Analysis of hybrid CNN models optimized with metaheuristic algorithms for melanoma detection.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Fractal gradient divergence-tuned deep belief network for osteoporosis detection using X-ray images.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Effects of platelet-rich plasma-assisted arthroscopic debridement plus microfracture surgery on visual analogue scale scores and cartilage repair indicators in early-stage knee osteoarthritis.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- VMamba-QAG-net: a five-stage pipeline for SYNTAX score computation and decision support in interventional cardiology using X-ray angiography.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Machine learning prediction of osteoarthritis risk from volatile organic compound exposure using SHAP interpretation in US adults.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a severe arthrodial joint condition with significant global socioeconomic consequences. Early recognition and treatment of KOA is critical for avoiding disease progression and developing effective treatment programs. The prevailing method for knee joint analysis involves manual diagnosis, segmentation, and annotation to diagnose osteoarthritis (OA) in clinical practice while being highly laborious and a susceptible variable among users. To address the constraints of this method, several deep learning techniques, particularly the deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs), were applied to increase the efficiency of the proposed workflow. The main objective of this study is to create advanced deep learning (DL) approaches for risk assessment to forecast the evolution of pain for people suffering from KOA or those at risk of developing it. The suggested methodology applies a collective transfer learning approach for extracting accurate deep features using four pre-trained models, VGG19, ResNet50, AlexNet, and GoogleNet, to extract features from KOA images. The numeral of extracted features was reduced for identifying the most appropriate feature attributes for the disease. The binary Greylag Goose (bGGO) optimizer was employed to perform this task, with an average fitness of 0.4137 and a best fitness of 0.3155. The chosen features were categorized utilizing both deep learning and machine learning approaches. Finally, a CNN hyper-parameter algorithm was performed utilizing GGO. The suggested model outperformed previous models with accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.988692, 0.980156, and 0.990089, respectively. A comprehensive statistical analysis test was performed to confirm the validity of our findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.