Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40369213›Full record

ArticleNature human behaviour2025

Information transfer within and between autistic and non-autistic people.

Catherine J Crompton, Sarah J Foster, Charlotte E H Wilks, Michelle Dodd, Themis N Efthimiou, Danielle Ropar, Noah J Sasson, Martin Lages, Sue Fletcher-Watson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature human behaviour, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Navigating Mixed-Neurotype Dialogue: Environmental and Affective Influences on Autistic Speakers.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Reduced Habituation: A Key to Understanding Sensory Sensitivity in Autism.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Catherine J CromptonCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. catherine.crompton@ed.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5280-1596
Sarah J FosterSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA.
Charlotte E H WilksSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Michelle DoddCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Themis N EfthimiouCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Danielle RoparSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Noah J SassonSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA.
Martin LagesSchool of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4962-3116
Sue Fletcher-WatsonSalvesen Mindroom Research Centre, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2688-1734

Funding

Templeton World Charity Foundation (Templeton World Charity Foundation, Inc.) TWCF-2020-20442
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autism is clinically defined by social communication deficits, suggesting that autistic people may be less effective at sharing information, particularly with one another. However, recent research indicates that neurotype mismatches, rather than autism itself, degrade information sharing. Here, using the diffusion chain method, we examined information transfer in autistic, non-autistic and mixed-neurotype chains (N = 311), replicating and extending a key study. We hypothesized that information transfer would deteriorate faster and rapport would be lower in mixed-neurotype compared with single-neurotype chains. Additionally, we examined whether informing participants of the diagnostic status of their chain and whether information was fictional or factual impacted performance and rapport. We found no difference in information transfer between single-neurotype and mixed-neurotype chains. Non-autistic chains indicated higher rapport, and disclosing diagnosis improved rapport. This result challenges assumptions about autistic communication deficits but contrasts with prior findings. Enhanced participant heterogeneity and methodological differences may explain these unexpected results. Protocol registration The Stage 1 protocol for this Registered Report was accepted in principle on 23 August 2022. The protocol, as accepted by the journal, can be found at https://osf.io/us9c7/ .

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderAutistic DisorderCommunicationInformation DisseminationInterpersonal RelationsAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40369213
PMCPMC12283400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.