Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40369179›Full record

ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2025

Epidural Contrast Patterns and Clinical Implications: An Educational Review.

Giuliano Lo Bianco, Barnabas T Shiferaw, Max Y Jin, Alaa Abd-Elsayed

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Giuliano Lo BiancoAnesthesiology and Pain Department, Fondazione Istituto "G. Giglio", Cefalù, Palermo, Italy.
Barnabas T ShiferawUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Max Y JinUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Alaa Abd-ElsayedDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA. alaaawny@hotmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe purpose of this educational review is to describe the contrast spread patterns that indicate accurate needle placement in the epidural space and spread patterns associated with erroneous needle insertion. RECENT

findingsEpidural injections are minimally invasive and commonly used for patients with acute and chronic back pain that does not respond to conservative management. Imaging with contrast is frequently used during this procedure to improve accuracy and reduce adverse events. Contrast spread patterns are an important tool that can help identify where the needle is placed and whether the placement is accurate. Despite this, there may be discrepancies in the interpretation of spread patterns which ultimately reduce the utility of contrast. Inaccurate needle placement may result in intrathecal/subarachnoid, subdural, fascial, or retrodural space of Okada injections. The correct interpretation of contrast spread patterns on imaging is crucial for confirming accurate epidural needle placement. Furthermore, understanding contrast patterns of improper needle placement can prevent adverse events that result from injection outside of the epidural space.

Indexed as

Back PainContrast MediaEpidural SpaceHumansInjections, EpiduralContrast MediaContrast spread patternsEducational reviewEpidural injectionsPain management

Identifiers

PMID40369179
PMCPMC12078379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.