ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2025
Genomic profiling and pathological assessment of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Giant cervicothoracic malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor in neurofibromatosis type 1: a case report of multidisciplinary management and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Midkine as a therapeutic node in NF1-driven neuro‑oncology: Biology, biomarkers, and translational strategies.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAddressing the significant clinical challenges associated with managing malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST), this study focuses on the difficulties encountered in achieving accurate pathological diagnosis and the exploration of effective treatment options through genomic analysis.
methodsThe study included 20 patients with an initial pathological diagnosis of MPNST. Next-generation sequencing-based genomic analysis was conducted to assess the molecular features of MPNST, specifically looking for somatic mutations and actionable mutations.
resultsThe genomic analysis resulted in diagnostic refinement or reassignment for 20% of the cases. Somatic mutations were predominantly enriched in the RTK/RAS pathway, accounting for 64.7% of the findings. Additionally, actionable mutations were identified in 70.6% of patients who had a confirmed diagnosis of MPNST. Notably, the study revealed the presence of altered genes that were absent in Western populations, suggesting potential ethnic differences and the opportunity for alternative treatment strategies. Furthermore, patients with CDKN2A mutations exhibited significantly shorter disease-free survival compared to those without such mutations, with median survival times of 6.08 months versus 14.3 months (p = 0.0038).
conclusionThe findings emphasize the necessity of molecular testing for accurate diagnosis of MPNST, which can guide optimal therapeutic options and highlight the need for tailored treatment strategies considering the heterogeneity of pathological phenotypes and molecular features among patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.