ArticleScientific reports2025
Investigation of mixing performance in electro-osmotic micromixers through rigid baffle design and parameter optimization.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electro-osmotic micromixers constitute a specialized class of active micromixers that apply alternating current (AC) to electrodes. This methodology promotes the formation of vortical structures within the fluid medium, resulting in a substantial increase in mixing homogeneity. In this study, the geometrical parameters of the electro-osmotic micromixer, for which two rigid baffles were implanted at the entrance, were optimized using the Taguchi method and response surface methodology (RSM). Data were obtained through a transient 2D model, simulated using COMSOL software based on the finite element method. After acquiring the optimized geometric parameters, the mixing index was assessed under various conditions, including inlet velocity, frequency, voltage, and phase lag of the alternating current. The optimized values of first baffle angle ([Formula: see text]), second baffle angle ([Formula: see text]), baffle length (L), the distance between baffles in the x direction (x), the distance between baffles in the y direction(y), and mixing chamber angle (α) were obtained [Formula: see text] and resulted in a 10.58% improvement in the mixing process index. The implementation of rigid baffles improved the mixing index by 8%. Furthermore, increasing the applied voltage from 1 to 3 V resulted in a 27% average enhancement of the mixing index. A maximum mixing index of 99.37% was achieved at a [Formula: see text] phase lag, representing an average 20.1% improvement compared to the absence of a phase lag. This reflects an approximate 65% increase at the initial stage compared to the scenario without any phase lag.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.