ArticleScientific reports2025
Ringxiety and internet addiction as factors affecting medical students' behaviour during clinical rotations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to analyse the experience of ringxiety among medical students and explore the relationships between ringxiety and Internet addiction in the context of phone usage behaviours among students, academic teachers, and patients. A cross-sectional study was conducted using a quantitative method with the Computer-Assisted Web Interview (CAWI) technique. The study group consisted of medical students from the third to the sixth year (N = 301), recruited from 18 medical universities in Poland. The study used an original questionnaire containing self-descriptive questions and the Internet Addiction Test (IAT). Ringxiety was reported by 38.1% of students, with men experiencing it more often than women (72.3%, p = 0.004). Only 8.0% of students were not classified as addicted. Self-worth scores were slightly lower in individuals without ringxiety (M = 5.88) compared to those with ringxiety (M = 6.01), though the difference was not statistically significant (t(252) = 0.57, p = 0.567). Students addicted to the Internet more frequently reported not experiencing ringxiety (59.7%, p = 0.002). The results of our study may raise awareness of ringxiety among students and highlight the need to limit mobile phone use during clinical classes by medical students and teaching physicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.