ArticleScientific reports2025
Physics informed neural networks for fluid flow analysis with repetitive parameter initialization.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toward Digital Twins for Optimal Radioembolization.PET clinics · 2026Review
- An approach to flow field prediction over the horizontal axis wind turbine by passive flow control device using CNN-Autoencoder model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have been widely used to capture the behavior of physical systems governed by partial differential equations (PDEs), enabling the simulation of fluid dynamics across various scenarios. However, when applied to stiff fluid problems, the existing PINNs often struggle with flow stagnations and converge to local minima, resulting in physically implausible solutions. To overcome these limitations, this study proposes a training strategy called "re-initialization". This strategy periodically modulates the training parameters of the PINN model, enabling it to escape local minima and effectively explore alternative solutions. The proposed method is validated on two-dimensional steady-state lid-driven cavity flow problems at high Reynolds numbers of 700 and 1,000. This strategy effectively simulated vortex and shear layers and achieved the lowest mean square error in both cases. Furthermore, principal component analysis confirmed its capability to dynamically modulate model parameters during the training process. These results show the effectiveness of the proposed training strategy in addressing stiff fluid problems. Moreover, this strategy establishes a foundation for overcoming local minima through the direct modulation of training parameters. This contribution not only enhances the accuracy of PINNs but also expands their applicability to more complex and stiff fluid flow analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.