Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40369050›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A novel two-stage feature selection method based on random forest and improved genetic algorithm for enhancing classification in machine learning.

Junyao Ding, Jianchao Du, Hejie Wang, Song Xiao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Junyao DingSchool of Telecommunications Engineering, Xidian University, Xi'an, 710071, China.
Jianchao DuSchool of Telecommunications Engineering, Xidian University, Xi'an, 710071, China. jcdu@xidian.edu.cn.
Hejie WangSchool of Telecommunications Engineering, Xidian University, Xi'an, 710071, China.
Song XiaoBeijing Electronic Science and Technology Institute, Beijing, 100070, China.

Funding

National Nature Science Foundation of China 62476013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The data acquisition methods are becoming increasingly diverse and advanced, leading to higher data dimensions, blurred classification boundaries, and overfitting datasets, affecting machine learning models' accuracy. Many studies have sought to improve model performance through feature selection. However, a single feature selection method has incomplete, unstable, or time-consuming shortcomings. Combining the advantages of various feature selection methods can help overcome these defects. This paper proposes a two-stage feature selection method based on random forest and improved genetic algorithm. First, the importance scores of the random forest are calculated and ranked, and the features are preliminarily eliminated according to the scores, reducing the time complexity of the subsequent process. Then, the improved genetic algorithm is used to search for the global optimal feature subset further. This process introduces a multi-objective fitness function to guide the feature subset, minimizing the number of features in the subset while enhancing classification accuracy. This paper also adds an adaptive mechanism and evolution strategy to improve the loss of population diversity and degeneration in the later stages of iteration, thereby enhancing search efficiency. The experimental results on eight UCI datasets show that the proposed method significantly improves classification performance and has excellent feature selection capability.

Indexed as

Data miningFeature selectionImproved genetic algorithmMachine learningRandom forest

Identifiers

PMID40369050
PMCPMC12078713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.