Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40369048›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Scream's roughness grants privileged access to the brain during sleep.

Guillaume Y T Legendre, Maëva Moyne, Judith Domínguez-Borràs, Samika Kumar, Virginie Sterpenich, Sophie Schwartz, Luc H Arnal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Acoustic estimation of voice roughness.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Rough is salient: a conserved vocal niche to hijack the brain's salience system.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Musical harmony is processed during sleep: a proof-of-concept study.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Guillaume Y T LegendreDepartment of Basic Neuroscience, University of Geneva, Rue Michel Servet 1, CH-1211, Geneva, Switzerland. guillaumeyt.legendre@gmail.com.
Maëva MoyneDefitech Chair for Clinical Neuroengineering, Neuro-X Institute (INX) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland.
Judith Domínguez-BorràsDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Geneva, 4 rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil, Genève 14, CH-1211, Switzerland.
Samika KumarDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, UK.
Virginie SterpenichDepartment of Basic Neuroscience, University of Geneva, Rue Michel Servet 1, CH-1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
Sophie SchwartzDepartment of Basic Neuroscience, University of Geneva, Rue Michel Servet 1, CH-1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
Luc H ArnalUniversité Paris Cité, Institut Pasteur, AP-HP, INSERM, CNRS, Fondation Pour l'Audition, Institut de l'Audition, IHU reConnect, Paris, 75012, France.

Funding

Fondation Pour l'Audition RD-2020-10Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 51NF40-104897
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During sleep, recognizing threatening signals is crucial to determine when to wake up and when to continue vital sleep functions. Screaming is perhaps the most efficient way for communicating danger at a distance or in conditions of limited visibility. Screams are characterized by rapid modulations of sound pressure in the so-called roughness range (i.e., 30-150 Hz) which are particularly powerful in capturing attention. However, whether these rough sounds are also processed in a privileged manner during sleep is unknown. We tested this hypothesis by presenting human participants with low-intensity vocalizations, including rough screams and neutral, low-roughness vocalizations during wakefulness and during a full night of sleep. We found that screams evoked cortical responses with higher theta phase-consistency as compared to neutral vocalizations during both wakefulness and NREM sleep. In addition, screams boosted sleep spindle power, suggesting elevated stimulus salience. These findings demonstrate that, even at low sound intensity (e.g., from a distant source), vocalizations' roughness conveys stimulus relevance and enhances exogenous processing in both the waking and sleeping states. Preserved differential neural responses based on stimulus salience may ensure adaptive reactions in a state where the brain is mostly disconnected from external inputs.

Indexed as

BrainSleepAcoustic StimulationAdultAuditory PerceptionElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleWakefulnessYoung AdultAuditory perceptionEEGEmotionsSleep

Identifiers

PMID40369048
PMCPMC12078618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.