ArticleScientific reports2025
Secure command transmission techniques for industrial remote control.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A comparative study of industrial and open-source SCADAs to optimize the design of control systems for the IFMIF-DONES plant.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Operating a factory near a war zone or in a country with an unstable political environment poses significant risks. These risks can be mitigated by managing production lines remotely. To preserve technical knowledge and specific algorithms, it is essential to implement secure, precise, and efficient remote control in industrial applications, especially considering the risks associated with storing operational code on controllers. To address these challenges, we propose a novel technique where executable commands are dynamically transmitted from a Python script to an ESP32-WROOM-32 microcontroller. Unlike conventional methods that preload code onto the controller, this approach interprets, executes, and erases commands immediately after execution, thereby enhancing security and precision. The proposed system was evaluated through a comparative analysis of eleven distinct methods, which varied in command transmission strategies and employed dual-core processing for performance optimization. VPN technology was integrated to enable remote control from geographically distant locations, demonstrating the system's adaptability for global industrial operations. The results indicate that this method significantly outperforms the traditional on-site approach, where operational code is preloaded onto the microcontroller. Specifically, bundled command transmission combined with dual-core processing proved particularly effective, reducing latency and improving reliability. These findings highlight the robustness of the proposed approach as a secure and flexible solution for modern smart factories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.