ArticleScientific reports2025
Menstrual cycle inspired latent diffusion model for image augmentation in energy production.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhanced cybersecurity threat detection using novel tri-metaheuristic loss functions in generative adversarial networks with adaptive attention preservation for network traffic augmentation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Enhanced paddy leaf disease detection using novel dual metaheuristic loss functions in generative adversarial networks with identity block preservation for thermal image augmentation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A novel Pulp Caries GAN multi loss GAN with new pulp inspired metaheuristics for pediatric dental caries detection and segmentation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Novel metaheuristic optimized latent diffusion framework for automated oral disease detection in public health screening.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Adaptive identity-regularized generative adversarial networks with species-specific loss functions for enhanced fish classification and segmentation through data augmentation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- DentoMorph-LDMs: diffusion models based on novel adaptive 8-connected gum tissue and deciduous teeth loss for dental image augmentation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the energy production domain, image classification is critical for monitoring, diagnostics, and operational optimization tasks. Latent diffusion models (LDMs) have shown potential in generating diverse images during the augmentation process based on text input. However, they are hindered by pixel integrity, texture consistency, and mode collapse. This paper introduces menstrual cycle-inspired latent diffusion model (MCI-LDM), a novel framework that addresses these challenges with three key modifications. First, a menstrual cycle-inspired metaheuristic algorithm is integrated to improve generated images' pixel integrity and structural coherence. Second, an adaptive attention mechanism is employed to dynamically focus on critical regions during image generation, ensuring that fine details are preserved. Third, a multi-scale feature enhancement module is incorporated to capture global structures and local textures, mitigating mode collapse and enhancing overall image quality. Extensive experiments were conducted on five energy-related datasets, demonstrating the superior performance of MCI-LDM in terms of image augmentation, diversity, and generation accuracy. The results highlight the efficiency of the proposed model, making it a valuable tool for improving image classification and data augmentation in energy sector applications. MCI-LDM outperforms LDM by generating more diverse images, with a higher Inception Score (7.1 vs. 5.4) and a lower Fréchet Inception Distance (22.5 vs. 35.2), indicating better quality and variation. Additionally, MCI-LDM preserves image integrity more effectively, achieving superior PSNR (32.7 dB vs. 28.5 dB) and SSIM (0.92 vs. 0.78).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.