ArticleScientific reports2025
A novel assessment system for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Performance of prediction models for delayed union and nonunion after fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Long-term impact of gastrointestinal risk stratification management on perioperative digestive complications in elderly osteoporotic vertebral fracture patients: a 10-year interrupted time series study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The objective of this study was to introduce and validate a novel developed scoring system tailored specifically for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs), aiming to provide guidance for treatment selection. A retrospective analysis spanning from March 2016 to March 2021 was conducted on 208 patients diagnosed with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) who received conservative treatment. Patients were categorized into low-score (47 cases), medium-score (98 cases), and high-score (63 cases) groups based on the Novel Assessment System for OVCFs (NASOVCF) scores. Comparative analyses of radiographic and clinical data were performed, and logistic regression analysis was used to determine the risk factors for bone non-union and progressive kyphosis. The high-score group exhibited significantly inferior outcomes, characterized by higher Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores (P < 0.05), increased vertebral height loss, and kyphosis angle differences compared to the low and medium-score groups (P < 0.05). Notably, a bone union rate of 38.1% (24/63) was observed in the high-score group, significantly lower than that of the low-score group (97.9%, 46/47). Furthermore, the progressive kyphosis rate was 47.6% (30/63) in the high-score group, significantly higher than the 17.3% (17/98) observed in the medium-score group and the 2.2% (1/46) observed in the low-score group. In multivariate analysis, higher NASOVCF score emerged as an independent risk factor for bone non-union (OR = 1.713, 95% CI 1.458-2.013, P < 0.001). Similarly, higher NASOVCF score (OR = 1.373, 95% CI 1.203-1.568, P < 0.001), along with female gender and higher pre-treatment ODI score, were identified as independent risk factors for progressive kyphosis. The area under the curve (AUC) for bone non-union and progressive kyphosis were 0.895 and 0.835, respectively, indicating robust discriminative performances. Higher NASOVCF score was identified as a significant risk factor for non-union and progressive kyphosis following conservative treatment in OVCFs. NASOVCF score emerged as a crucial predictor for adverse outcomes in patients at high risk who underwent conservative management. Surgical interventions such as vertebral augmentation may represent a potentially superior option for individuals with high NASOVCF scores.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.