ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluation of synthetic data impact on fire segmentation models performance.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Timely fire detection in industrial environments is crucial to safeguarding people and property. Deep neural networks have shown effectiveness in fire detection over traditional methods. However, they require high-quality datasets, which are costly and time-intensive to gather. To overcome this issue, we created the SYN-FIRE dataset, consisting of 2000 labeled images of simulated indoor industrial fires using NVIDIA Omniverse. By using U-Net++ as the baseline, this study explores the impact of the new SYN-FIRE dataset on models' performance when combined with four publicly available datasets. Two ablation studies were conducted: one replacing portions of real data from publicly available datasets with synthetic data and the other adding various amounts of synthetic data. With over 200 models trained across three resolutions, the results indicate that incorporating additional synthetic data improved DiceScore by [Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text] (FireBot and BowFire datasets, respectively) while substituting real data with synthetic data generally enhanced performance but with exceptions. Furthermore, tests on challenging real-life fire images confirmed that synthetic data boosts model generalization, supported by GRAD-CAM saliency maps. Finally, we provide key takeaways that point out the main findings of our research. The SYN-FIRE dataset is publicly available to encourage further research in fire detection and prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.