Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40369011›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A multi-layered defense against adversarial attacks in brain tumor classification using ensemble adversarial training and feature squeezing.

Ahmeed Yinusa, Misa Faezipour

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ahmeed YinusaComputational and Data Science Program, Middle Tennessee State University, 1301 East Main Street, Murfreesboro, TN, 37132, USA.
Misa FaezipourDepartment of Engineering Technology, Middle Tennessee State University, 1301 East Main Street, Murfreesboro, TN, 37132, USA. misa.faezipour@mtsu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning, particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs), has proven valuable for brain tumor classification, aiding diagnostic and therapeutic decisions in medical imaging. Despite their accuracy, these models are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, compromising their reliability in clinical settings. In this research, we utilized a VGG16-based CNN model to classify brain tumors, achieving 96% accuracy on clean magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. To assess robustness, we exposed the model to Fast Gradient Sign Method (FGSM) and Projected Gradient Descent (PGD) attacks, which reduced accuracy to 32% and 13%, respectively. We then applied a multi-layered defense strategy, including adversarial training with FGSM and PGD examples and feature squeezing techniques such as bit-depth reduction and Gaussian blurring. This approach improved model resilience, achieving 54% accuracy on FGSM and 47% on PGD adversarial examples. Our results highlight the importance of proactive defense strategies for maintaining the reliability of AI in medical imaging under adversarial conditions.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDeep LearningAlgorithmsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerReproducibility of ResultsAdversarial attacksAdversarial trainingArtificial intelligence (AI)Brain tumorFeature squeezingMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

Identifiers

PMID40369011
PMCPMC12078522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.