ArticleScientific reports2025
A multi-layered defense against adversarial attacks in brain tumor classification using ensemble adversarial training and feature squeezing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Applications, image analysis, and interpretation of computer vision in medical imaging.Frontiers in radiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep learning, particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs), has proven valuable for brain tumor classification, aiding diagnostic and therapeutic decisions in medical imaging. Despite their accuracy, these models are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, compromising their reliability in clinical settings. In this research, we utilized a VGG16-based CNN model to classify brain tumors, achieving 96% accuracy on clean magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. To assess robustness, we exposed the model to Fast Gradient Sign Method (FGSM) and Projected Gradient Descent (PGD) attacks, which reduced accuracy to 32% and 13%, respectively. We then applied a multi-layered defense strategy, including adversarial training with FGSM and PGD examples and feature squeezing techniques such as bit-depth reduction and Gaussian blurring. This approach improved model resilience, achieving 54% accuracy on FGSM and 47% on PGD adversarial examples. Our results highlight the importance of proactive defense strategies for maintaining the reliability of AI in medical imaging under adversarial conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.