Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40368945›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Critical mineral constraints pressure energy transition and trade toward the Paris Agreement climate goals.

Huiting Shi, Jiani Heng, Hongbo Duan, Huajiao Li, Weiqiang Chen, Peng Wang, Lianbiao Cui, Shouyang Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Huiting Shi *School of Economics & Management, Xidian University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-6125-6437
Jiani Heng *School of Mathematics and Statistics, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing, China.
Hongbo DuanSchool of Economics & Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. hbduan@ucas.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5143-4413
Huajiao LiSchool of Economics & Management, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, China.
Weiqiang ChenInstitute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Peng WangInstitute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen, Fujian, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7170-1494
Lianbiao CuiSchool of Statistics and Applied Mathematics, Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Bengbu, Anhui, China.
Shouyang WangSchool of Economics & Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 72325008National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 72342002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clean energy transition centered on photovoltaic solar and wind power is widely regarded as the fundamental way to achieve the Paris Agreement's pledges. The development of clean energies, however, relies much more on critical minerals than that of conventional ones. It is therefore vital to incorporate mineral constraints into integrated assessment modeling and designing of energy transition pathways. To this end, we reexamine the feasibility of China's energy transition evaluated by 5 typical integrated assessment models, then reconfigure the pathways and assess possible trade and warming risks by designing primary mineral supply, recovery and technological progress scenarios. The results indicate that the contribution of solar and wind power to achieve the Paris Agreement goals may far below our expectation due to critical mineral constraints, and the installed capacity of the targeted two renewables will averagely decline by over 56.7% and 68.9%, respectively, by 2060 under the 1.5 °C warming limit. This may lead to an emission gap of carbon reduction by up to 2.35 GtCO

Identifiers

PMID40368945
PMCPMC12078721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.