ArticleScientific data2025
Dataset for Evaluating the Production of Phonotactically Legal and Illegal Pseudowords.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The "MEG-GLOUPS" dataset offers a curated collection of raw magnetoencephalography recordings from seventeen French participants engaged in a pseudoword learning task as well as resting-state activity before and after the task. A dataset called Gloups with the same participants and a similar learning task adapted to functional magnetic resonance imaging is already available. In the learning task, participants were instructed to pronounce monosyllabic pseudowords, which were presented both visually and auditorily. These pseudowords were either phonotactically legal or illegal in the participants' native language, French. We organized the dataset according to the Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS), pre-processed the data and performed a minimal analysis of Event-Related Fields (ERFs), to ensure data quality and integrity of the dataset. This data collection includes comprehensive descriptions of the theoretical background, methods, data recordings, and technical validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.