Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40368764›Full record

ArticleAnnals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia2025

Machine Learning-Based Random Forest to Predict 3-Year Survival after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

Toshiya Nishibe, Tsuyoshi Iwasa, Seiji Matsuda, Masaki Kano, Shinobu Akiyama, Shoji Fukuda, Masayasu Nishibe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Toshiya NishibeDepartment of Medical Management and Informatics, Hokkaido Information University, Ebetsu, Hokkaido, Japan.
Tsuyoshi IwasaDepartment of Medical Management and Informatics, Hokkaido Information University, Ebetsu, Hokkaido, Japan.
Seiji MatsudaDepartment of Medical Management and Informatics, Hokkaido Information University, Ebetsu, Hokkaido, Japan.
Masaki KanoDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Shinobu AkiyamaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Shoji FukudaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Masayasu NishibeDepartment of Surgery, Eniwa Midorino Clinic, Eniwa, Hokkaido, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEndovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is widely used to treat abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), but mid-term survival remains a concern. This study aims to develop a machine learning-based random forest model to predict 3-year survival after EVAR.

methodsA random forest model was trained using data from 176 EVAR patients, of whom 169 patients were retained for analysis, incorporating 23 preoperative and perioperative variables. Model performance was evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation.

resultsThe model achieved an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.91, with an accuracy of 81.1%, a sensitivity of 81.6%, a specificity of 80.9%, and an F1 score of 0.66. Feature importance analysis identified poor nutritional status (geriatric nutritional risk index <101.4), compromised immunity (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio >3.19), chronic kidney disease (CKD), octogenarian status, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), small aneurysm size, and statin use as the top predictors of 3-year mortality. The average values of the AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1 score across the 5-folds were 0.76 ± 0.10, 73.9 ± 5.8%, 60.4 ± 1.9%, 77.8 ± 0.7%, and 0.59 ± 0.17, indicating consistent performance across different data subsets.

conclusionsThe random forest model effectively predicts 3-year survival after EVAR, indicating key factors such as poor nutritional status, compromised immunity, CKD, octogenarian status, COPD, small aneurysm size, and statin use.

Indexed as

Aortic Aneurysm, AbdominalBlood Vessel Prosthesis ImplantationDecision Support TechniquesEndovascular ProceduresMachine LearningAgedAged, 80 and overEndovascular Aneurysm RepairFemaleHumansMaleNutritional StatusPredictive Value of TestsRandom ForestReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective Studiesabdominal aortic aneurysmendovascular aneurysm repairfeature importancemachine learningrandom forest

Identifiers

PMID40368764
PMCPMC12086006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.