Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40368636›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2025

Comparing Outcomes Among Medicaid Home and Community-Based Service Users: Private Homes vs. Assisted Living Facilities.

Hyunjee Kim, Katherine Courchaine, Angela Senders, Clint Sergi, Hiroko H Dodge, R Tamara Konetzka

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hyunjee KimCenter for Health Systems Effectiveness, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3177-7184
Katherine CourchaineCenter for Health Systems Effectiveness, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Angela SendersCenter for Health Systems Effectiveness, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Clint SergiCenter for Health Systems Effectiveness, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Hiroko H DodgeDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
R Tamara KonetzkaBiological Sciences Division, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3016-1318

Funding

High Performance Computing and Machine Learning Infrastructure for Oregon Life SciencesS10OD034224 · OD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI ELLROTT, KYLE · 2023 to 2023
$2.0M
Home and Community-Based Service Use, Health Outcomes, and Health Care Costs for People with Alzheimer's Disease and Related DementiasR01AG069782 · NIA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI KIM, HYUNJEE · 2024 to 2024
$484k
NIA NIH HHS 4R01AG069782-02NIA NIH HHS R01 AG069782NIH HHS S10 OD034224NIH HHS S10OD034224
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare outcomes of Medicaid home and community-based services (HCBS) users residing in a private home vs. in an assisted living facility among dually eligible individuals aged 65 or older. STUDY SETTING AND

designMedicaid HCBS occurred either in private homes or assisted living facilities in 883 counties in 39 states in the United States from 2016 to 2019. We used an instrumental variable (IV) approach to account for unmeasured factors that might confound the association between HCBS settings and outcomes. Our IV was the monthly proportion of HCBS users in a private home (vs. in an assisted living facility) in surrounding counties within the same state. We examined four outcomes: hospitalizations, emergency department visits, days at home, and Medicare spending. DATA SOURCES AND ANALYTIC SAMPLE: We used Medicare and Medicaid claims linked at the individual level. Our sample included dually eligible individuals aged 65 or older, enrolled in Medicare fee-for-service plans, who used HCBS either in a private home or an assisted living facility, between 2016 and 2019. PRINCIPAL

findingsOur sample included 8,140,213 person-months from 383,607 individuals, of whom 85% lived at home and 15% in assisted living facilities. Compared to those in assisted living facilities, in-home HCBS users were 1.3 percentage points more likely to be hospitalized each month (95% CI: 0.8-1.8) and had 0.3 fewer days at home per month (95% CI: -0.4 to -0.1). In an analysis using a sample matched on observed person-months, HCBS users at home had higher likelihoods of hospitalizations and emergency department visits, fewer days at home, and higher Medicaid spending.

conclusionsOverall, in-home HCBS users were more likely to experience adverse health events than those in assisted living facilities, suggesting that policymakers should consider improving care for HCBS users in private homes.

Indexed as

Assisted Living FacilitiesCommunity Health ServicesHome Care ServicesMedicaidAgedAged, 80 and overEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHealth ExpendituresHospitalizationHumansMaleMedicareUnited Statesdual eligiblesHCBShome and community‐based servicesinstrumental variable approachIV approachlong‐term carelong‐term services and supports

Identifiers

PMID40368636
PMCPMC12461114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.