ArticleHealth services research2025
Comparing Outcomes Among Medicaid Home and Community-Based Service Users: Private Homes vs. Assisted Living Facilities.
Article in Health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- How Should We Identify Home- and Community-Based Services (HCBS) in Medicaid Claims Data? An Evaluation and Synthesis of Algorithms.Health services research · 2026Article
- Is Medicare Home Health Care Utilization Substituting for Long-Term Care? Evidence From Dual Eligible Beneficiaries.Health services research · 2026Article
- Comparing Outcomes Among Medicaid Home and Community-Based Service Users: Private Homes vs. Assisted Living Facilities.Health services research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo compare outcomes of Medicaid home and community-based services (HCBS) users residing in a private home vs. in an assisted living facility among dually eligible individuals aged 65 or older. STUDY SETTING AND
designMedicaid HCBS occurred either in private homes or assisted living facilities in 883 counties in 39 states in the United States from 2016 to 2019. We used an instrumental variable (IV) approach to account for unmeasured factors that might confound the association between HCBS settings and outcomes. Our IV was the monthly proportion of HCBS users in a private home (vs. in an assisted living facility) in surrounding counties within the same state. We examined four outcomes: hospitalizations, emergency department visits, days at home, and Medicare spending. DATA SOURCES AND ANALYTIC SAMPLE: We used Medicare and Medicaid claims linked at the individual level. Our sample included dually eligible individuals aged 65 or older, enrolled in Medicare fee-for-service plans, who used HCBS either in a private home or an assisted living facility, between 2016 and 2019. PRINCIPAL
findingsOur sample included 8,140,213 person-months from 383,607 individuals, of whom 85% lived at home and 15% in assisted living facilities. Compared to those in assisted living facilities, in-home HCBS users were 1.3 percentage points more likely to be hospitalized each month (95% CI: 0.8-1.8) and had 0.3 fewer days at home per month (95% CI: -0.4 to -0.1). In an analysis using a sample matched on observed person-months, HCBS users at home had higher likelihoods of hospitalizations and emergency department visits, fewer days at home, and higher Medicaid spending.
conclusionsOverall, in-home HCBS users were more likely to experience adverse health events than those in assisted living facilities, suggesting that policymakers should consider improving care for HCBS users in private homes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.