ArticleCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2025
Electronic consultation questions asked to addiction medicine specialists by primary care providers: Retrospective content analysis.
Article in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the major themes among clinical questions asked to addiction medicine specialists sent by primary care providers (PCPs) via the Champlain Building Access to Specialists through the eConsultation (BASE™) electronic consultation (eConsult) service and the PCP-perceived benefits of this service.
designA descriptive, retrospective study of the eConsult cases submitted to addiction medicine specialists between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2021.
settingChamplain region of eastern Ontario.
participantsPrimary care providers who sent an eConsult to addiction medicine.
interventionsThe BASE™ eConsult service was used to facilitate communication between PCPs and addiction medicine specialists.
main outcome measuresThe classification of question types and clinical topics asked in eConsult cases sent to addiction medicine specialists by PCPs, and the answers in the close-out surveys completed by PCPs after eConsult was completed.
resultsPrimary care providers sought advice regarding opioids (38.0%) and alcohol (34.9%). The most common question types involved pharmacologic (77.5%) and nonpharmacologic (65.1%) management of patients with substance use. Electronic consultations were most frequently related to the clinical topic of chronic pain (28.7%). Over 95% of eConsults were answered by a specialist within 7 calendar days. Providers reported finding the eConsult responses helpful, with nearly one-third of PCPs reporting a potential referral was avoided following an eConsult from specialists.
conclusionThis study demonstrates that PCPs sought advice on management regarding opioids and alcohol, reflecting the challenges in controlled substance prescribing during an opioid crisis, with alcohol use disorder being the most prevalent substance use disorder in Canada. The eConsult service provided an accessible, timely, and beneficial process for PCPs to obtain addiction medicine specialist advice. Given the overlap with the COVID-19 pandemic and the study timeframe, further studies to examine postpandemic eConsults will allow for better generalizability of the findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.