Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40368404›Full record

ArticleWork (Reading, Mass.)2025

Social and health impacts of exoskeleton use on care workers.

Riika Saurio, Satu Pekkarinen, Pihla Säynäjäkangas, Satu Mänttäri, Ari-Pekka Rauttola, Juha Oksa, Helinä Melkas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Work (Reading, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Riika SaurioSchool of Engineering Science, Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology LUT, Lahti, Finland.ORCID 0009-0006-0462-2095
Satu PekkarinenSchool of Engineering Science, Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology LUT, Lahti, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-0555-5884
Pihla SäynäjäkangasFinnish Institute of Occupational Health (FIOH), Helsinki & Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-3063-400X
Satu MänttäriFinnish Institute of Occupational Health (FIOH), Helsinki & Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-4085-4839
Ari-Pekka RauttolaFinnish Institute of Occupational Health (FIOH), Helsinki & Oulu, Finland.
Juha OksaFinnish Institute of Occupational Health (FIOH), Helsinki & Oulu, Finland.
Helinä MelkasSchool of Engineering Science, Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology LUT, Lahti, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-9455-819X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundIn many countries, the growing shortage of care workers versus the growing number of people needing care is causing concern. In this healthcare transformation, exoskeletons, a form of wearable robotics, have been introduced as a means to aid care workers in their physically demanding and ergonomically challenging work.ObjectiveThis study investigated the human impacts of exoskeleton use in care work. We followed a mixed-methods research approach, presenting a novel combination of qualitative and quantitative research.MethodsWe conducted a three-week trial of an exoskeleton with eight assistant nurses in a round-the-clock care home. Qualitative data consist of pre-interviews, post-interviews and user diaries. Quantitative data were collected via physiological measurements.ResultsSeveral types of social and health impacts of exoskeleton use were identified. The qualitative analysis revealed physical, mental, work practice and learning-related impacts. The exoskeleton was most useful in bed care activities. The physiological measurement results demonstrated a trend-like reduction in muscle activity throughout the workday and in different work tasks when using the exoskeleton. The exoskeleton did not have an impact on metabolic strain or perceived exertion but did increase perceived discomfort after the measured work shift when using the exoskeleton.ConclusionsBoth the qualitative and quantitative results suggest that there is potential for exoskeleton use in care work environments if sufficient attention is paid to its essential prerequisites. These include the care work and tasks in question, care workers' interests and competences, the environment, planning and organisation of the work, managerial practices and clients' health.

Indexed as

Exoskeleton DeviceHealth PersonnelAdultErgonomicsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Researchcare workexoskeletonphysiological measurementqualitative impact assessmentsocial and health impacts

Identifiers

PMID40368404
PMCPMC12547050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.