Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40368381›Full record

ArticleStatistical methods in medical research2025

Rank-based estimators of global treatment effects for cluster randomized trials with multiple endpoints on different scales.

Emma Davies Smith, Vipul Jairath, Guangyong Zou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistical methods in medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emma Davies SmithDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8200-7908
Vipul JairathDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Guangyong ZouDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.

Funding

BIOSTATISTICS/EPIDEMIOLOGY TRAINING GRANTS IN AIDST32AI007358 · NIAID · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI Michael David Hughes · 1989 to 2026
$12.4M
NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007358
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cluster randomized trials commonly employ multiple endpoints. When a single summary of treatment effects across endpoints is of primary interest, global methods represent a common analysis strategy. However, specification of the required joint distribution is non-trivial, particularly when the endpoints have different scales. We develop rank-based interval estimators for a global treatment effect referred to here as the "global win probability, or the mean of multiple Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney probabilities, and interpreted as the probability that a treatment individual responds better than a control individual on average. Using endpoint-specific ranks among the combined sample and within each arm, each individual-level observation is converted to a "win fraction" which quantifies the proportion of wins experienced over every observation in the comparison arm. An individual's multiple observations are then replaced with a single "global win fraction" by averaging win fractions across endpoints. A linear mixed model is applied directly to the global win fractions to obtain point, variance, and interval estimates adjusted for clustering. Simulation demonstrates our approach performs well concerning confidence interval coverage and type I error, and methods are easily implemented using standard software. A case study using public data is provided with corresponding R and SAS code.

Indexed as

Endpoint DeterminationRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCluster AnalysisComputer SimulationHumansLinear ModelsModels, StatisticalTreatment OutcomeCluster randomized trialsglobal treatment effectslinear mixed modelsnonparametric rank-sum testWilcoxon Mann-whitney statisticwin ratio

Identifiers

PMID40368381
PMCPMC12478089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.