Observational studyThe Canadian journal of cardiology2025
Reassessing Cardiovascular Risk in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease Undergoing Myocardial Perfusion Imaging.
Observational study in The Canadian journal of cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCoronary artery disease (CAD) and peripheral artery disease (PAD) are often regarded as analogous risk factors for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), given their shared pathophysiology. We aimed to investigate whether the elevated MACE risk in PAD is driven by myocardial perfusion abnormalities or through other PAD-specific mediators.
methodsWe analyzed 45,252 patients from an international, multicentre registry who underwent SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging, excluding those with early coronary revascularization (< 90 days). Myocardial perfusion abnormalities were quantified using total perfusion deficit (TPD). MACE was defined as all-cause mortality, unstable angina admission, myocardial infarction, or late coronary revascularization. PAD was defined using questionnaires or review of electronic medical records. Propensity-score matching was used to select balanced groups of patients with and without PAD.
resultsDuring a median follow-up of 3.6 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 2.6-4.8 years), 5932 patients (13.7%) experienced at least 1 MACE. Compared with patients with neither disease, isolated history of CAD (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.80-2.05) conferred a similar MACE risk as concomitant history of CAD and PAD (aHR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.44-1.71) and greater risk than isolated history of PAD (aHR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.09-1.32; P < 0.001). After propensity-score matching, history of PAD alone was not independently associated with increased MACE risk (P = 0.064).
conclusionsAlthough patients with PAD often have concomitant CAD and greater myocardial perfusion abnormalities, PAD itself was not linked to higher risk of MACE after adjusting for these factors. These findings highlight the importance of assessing myocardial ischemic burden in PAD for risk stratification and prompt initiation of disease-modifying therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.