Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40368137›Full record

ReviewMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2025

Top-Down and Middle-Down Mass Spectrometry of Antibodies.

Nina A Khristenko, Konstantin O Nagornov, Camille Garcia, Natalia Gasilova, Megan Gant, Karen Druart, Anton N Kozhinov, Laure Menin, Julia Chamot-Rooke, Yury O Tsybin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Deep Proteoform Sequencing with Top-Down Direct Mass Technology.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Tumor-Targeted Delivery Therapy Based on PLGA Nanoparticles.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nina A KhristenkoSpectrotech SAS, Lyon, France.
Konstantin O NagornovSpectroswiss Sarl, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Camille GarciaInstitut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, and CNRS UAR2024, Paris, France.
Natalia GasilovaEcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Megan GantInstitut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, and CNRS UAR2024, Paris, France.
Karen DruartInstitut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, and CNRS UAR2024, Paris, France.
Anton N KozhinovSpectroswiss Sarl, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Laure MeninEcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Julia Chamot-RookeInstitut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, and CNRS UAR2024, Paris, France.
Yury O TsybinSpectrotech SAS, Lyon, France; Spectroswiss Sarl, Lausanne, Switzerland. Electronic address: tsybin@spectroswiss.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Therapeutic antibodies, primarily immunoglobulin G-based monoclonal antibodies, are developed to treat cancer, autoimmune disorders, and infectious diseases. Their large size, structural complexity, and heterogeneity pose significant analytical challenges, requiring advanced characterization techniques. This review traces the 30-year evolution of top-down (TD) and middle-down (MD) mass spectrometry (MS) for antibody analysis, beginning with their initial applications and highlighting key advances and challenges throughout this period. TD MS allows for the analysis of intact antibodies, and MD MS performs analysis of the antibody subunits, even in complex biological samples. Both approaches preserve critical quality attributes such as sequence integrity, post-translational modifications (PTMs), disulfide bonds, and glycosylation patterns. Key milestones in TD and MD MS of antibodies include the use of structure-specific enzymes for subunit generation, the implementation of high-resolution mass spectrometers, and the adoption of non-ergodic ion activation methods such as electron transfer dissociation (ETD), electron capture dissociation (ECD), ultraviolet photodissociation (UVPD), and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization in-source decay (MALDI-ISD). The combination of complementary dissociation methods and consecutive ion activation approaches has further enhanced TD/MD MS performance. The current TD MS record of antibody sequencing with terminal product ions is about 60% sequence coverage obtained using the activated ion-ETD approach on a high-resolution MS platform. Current MD MS analyses with about 95% sequence coverage were achieved using combinations of ion activation and dissociation techniques. The review explores TD and MD MS analysis of novel mAb modalities, including antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific antibodies, endogenous antibodies from biofluids, and immunoglobulin A and M-type classes.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalMass SpectrometryAnimalsGlycosylationHumansProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalAntibodies, MonoclonalADCantibody-drug conjugateelectron transfer dissociationETDmAbmiddle-down mass spectrometrymonoclonal antibodyOrbitrapproteoformtop-down mass spectrometry

Identifiers

PMID40368137
PMCPMC12343474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.