ReviewACS nano2025
Drop Friction and Failure on Superhydrophobic and Slippery Surfaces.
Review in ACS nano, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Thermo-Photo Dual-Curing Enables Dense Polymer Networks Toward Robust and Fluorine-Free Superhydrophobic Coatings.Small methods · 2026Article
- Silica Sol-Gel Coatings for Solar Panels: Drop Friction and Particle Adhesion.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The mobility of drops on a surface influences how much water and energy is required to clean the surface. By controlling drop mobility, it is possible to promote or reduce fogging, icing, and fouling. Superhydrophobic and slippery liquid-infused surfaces both display high drop mobility despite being 'lubricated' by fluids having very different viscosities. Superhydrophobic surfaces rely on micro- and/or nanoscale textures to trap air pockets beneath drops, minimizing solid-liquid contact. In contrast, on liquid-infused surfaces, these solid textures are filled with an immiscible liquid lubricant. Over the past few years, innovations in experimental and computational methods have provided detailed new insights into the static and dynamic wetting properties of drops on these surfaces. In this review, we describe the criteria needed to obtain stable wetting states with low drop friction and high mobility on both surfaces, and discuss the mechanisms that have been proposed to explain the origins of friction on each surface. Drops can collapse from the low-friction Cassie state to the high-friction Wenzel state on both surfaces, but the transition follows different pathways: on liquid-infused surfaces, the wetting ridge near the drop edge plays a central role in triggering collapse, a phenomenon not observed on superhydrophobic surfaces. This review emphasizes that a liquid-infused surface cannot be simply viewed as a superhydrophobic surface with the air pockets replaced by lubricant. The wetting ridge surrounding drops on liquid-infused surfaces significantly alters most of the drop's properties, including macroscopic shape, friction mechanisms, and the mechanism of collapse to a Wenzel state.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.