ArticlePloS one2025
Effective remediation programs for vulnerable students to overcome learning loss.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In March 2020, the world was forced to cope with the COVID-19 pandemic, and as a result, schools in many countries closed to minimize the spread of the coronavirus. Students were required to shift to online learning from home. Not long after that, research showed that students in the first half-year of the COVID-19 pandemic experienced extensive learning losses compared to peers from previous cohorts. An important question is whether these losses can be remediated or lead to permanently lower attainment for a generation of students. Here, we study the effectiveness of a nationwide attempt at remediation in the Netherlands, where the government provided funds for schools to proactively minimize the detrimental effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Unique standardized test score data of over 66,000 Dutch primary school students were combined with information about the various remediation programs employed uniquely in each school to investigate to what extent remediation occurred. Applying a Difference-in-Differences design, we find an overall statistically significant and meaningful increase in the achievement of vulnerable students after participation in remediation programs (+ 0.05 SD). Participating students had a higher increase in test scores compared to non-participants within the same school, and the inequality between the latter and former has slightly been reduced (~10%). Remediation programs offering individual support to students or in small groups, and with a sole emphasis on cognitive skill development, were most successful.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.