ArticlePloS one2025
Association between early-pandemic food assistance use and subsequent food security trajectories among households in Washington State during the first three years of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Consequences of COVID-19 Lockdown on Food Insecurity and Food Quality in Two Mediterranean Countries (Spain and Morocco).Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundResearch on COVID-19's impact on food insecurity has primarily relied on cross-sectional data or long recall periods, with limited investigations into longitudinal patterns or the role of food assistance.
methodsWe analyzed longitudinal data from 703 respondents participating in at least three Washington State Food Security Survey waves between June 18, 2020, and January 7, 2023. We assessed food security using the United States Department of Agriculture's six-item module, categorizing respondents' trajectories as persistently food secure, persistently food insecure, or experiencing one or more food insecurity transitions. We categorized food assistance use as never used, used before COVID-19 but not at baseline, did not use before COVID-19 but used at baseline, or always used. We descriptively examined sociodemographic factors linked to each food security trajectory and food assistance use pattern. We assessed associations between food assistance use and food security trajectories using modified Poisson regression.
resultsWe found that 20.2% of respondents were persistently food insecure, and 22.5% experienced one or more food insecurity transitions. Both patterns were more common among respondents who were aged 35 to 64, had a gender identity other than man or woman, were non-Hispanic Black, were single or divorced, had children, had some college education or less, reported $35,000 or less in household income, or were unemployed. In fully adjusted models, respondents who were newly using food assistance early in the COVID-19 pandemic had a higher probability of being persistently food insecure (marginal effect [ME] = 0.320, 95% CI = 0.204, 0.436) or experiencing one or more food insecurity transitions (ME = 0.216, 95% CI = 0.069, 0.363), than those who never used assistance.
conclusionsOur findings highlight the importance of examining food security trajectories and food assistance use patterns and implementing policies that help households new to food assistance programs navigate these systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.