ArticlePloS one2025
Swin-HSSAM: A green coffee bean grading method by Swin transformer.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A novel shifted window (Swin) Transformer coffee bean grading model called Swin-HSSAM has been proposed to address the challenges of accurately classifying green coffee beans and low identification accuracy. This model integrated the Swin Transformer as the backbone network; fused features from the second, third, and fourth stages using the high-level screening-feature pyramid networks module; and incorporated the selective attention module (SAM) for discriminative power enhancement to enhance the feature outputs before classification. Fusion Loss was employed as the loss function. Experimental results on a proprietary coffee bean dataset demonstrate that the Swin-HSSAM model achieved an average grading accuracy of 96.34% for the three grading as well as the nine defect subdivision levels, outperforming the AlexNet, VGG16, ResNet50, MobileNet-v2, Vision Transformer (ViT), and CrossViT models by 3.86%, 2.56%, 0.44%, 4.05%, 5.36%, and 5.40% percentage points, respectively. Evaluations on a public coffee bean dataset revealed that, compared with the aforementioned models, the Swin-HSSAM model improved the average grading accuracy by 1.01%, 0.13%, 4.75%, 0.85%, 0.73%, and 0.27% percentage points, respectively. These results indicate that the Swin-HSSAM model not only achieved high grading accuracy but also exhibited broad applicability, providing a novel solution for the automated grading and identification of green coffee beans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.