Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40367118›Full record

ArticleSociology of health & illness2025

Allyship in Healthcare for People With Learning Disabilities as a Praxis of Respect, Attention and Collaborative Action.

Bojana Daw Srdanovic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sociology of health & illness, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Bojana Daw SrdanovicPeninsula Medical School, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, England.ORCID 0009-0003-3911-0186

Funding

Economic and Social Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a dearth of literature focusing on how allyship in health may be enacted in relation to people with learning disabilities (LD). This is concerning, because people with LD are vulnerable to health inequalities and forms of medical dehumanisation including do-not-resuscitate orders, diagnostic overshadowing and overprescription of psychotropic drugs. Deploying critical disability studies as a lens through which to understand disability, this paper reviews models of disability allyship developed in healthcare, research and theatre. In doing so it advocates transformative allyship as a model that can both animate action in support of people with learning disabilities and accommodate the involvement of others, including clinicians, carers and relatives, without compromising the all-important commitment to supporting disability cultures. The paper presents and analyses ethnographic data gained through observations of eleven healthcare appointments between seven clinicians and five patients with LD, undertaken as part of the ESRC-funded study Humanising Healthcare. It documents the potential of transformative allyship in healthcare to transform harmful disablist practices through emphasising respect, attention and collaborative action while also noting that broader structural conditions and diagnostic technologies limit the extent to which clinicians can enact transformative allyship.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorDelivery of Health CareLearning DisabilitiesPersons with DisabilitiesAnthropology, CulturalAttentionHumansallyshipdisability allyshipdisability allyship in healthcareintellectual disabilitylearning disability

Identifiers

PMID40367118
PMCPMC12077749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.