ArticlePloS one2025
Waist rotation angle as indicator of probable human collision-avoidance direction for autonomous mobile robots.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Quantifying mutual hesitation and identifying kinematic predictors in near-collision avoidance in walking.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The likelihood of pedestrians encountering autonomous mobile robots (AMRs) in smart cities is steadily increasing. While previous studies have explored human-to-human collision avoidance, the behavior of humans avoiding AMRs in direct, head-on scenarios remains underexplored. To address this gap, we conducted a psychophysical experiment to observe how humans react to an AMR approaching directly. The AMR was programmed to approach from various starting points, including a direct path toward participants, and their avoidance movements were recorded. Participants were instructed to evade by moving either right or left, with no strong preference for a particular direction observed. This suggests that avoidance direction is not strictly influenced by individual factors, such as adherence to regional traffic norms. Additionally, motion analysis revealed that participants instinctively twisted their waists in the direction of avoidance before evading. Further experiments assessed the role of waist rotation angle in influencing human comfort during AMR avoidance. The results indicated that early AMR avoidance improved participant comfort. Moreover, using an RGB camera allowed non-contact measuring without sensors, broadening the applicability of the technique. These findings suggest that waist rotation reliably predicts avoidance direction, and non-contact detection methods, such as RGB cameras, show substantial potential for broader applications. Further research will focus on improving the accuracy and robustness of these non-contact techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.