ArticlePloS one2025
Development of a novel risk score for diagnosing urinary tract infections: Integrating Sysmex UF-5000i urine fluorescence flow cytometry with urinalysis.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rapid screening of urinary tract infections: quantitative flow cytometry versus dipstick testing in a hospital cohort.Infection · 2026Article
- Multivariable Urine Flow Cytometry-Based Screening for Prediction of Urine Culture Positivity.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Risk Factors for Perioperative Urinary Tract Infection After Living Donor Kidney Transplantation Characterized by High Prevalence of Desensitization Therapy: A Single-Center Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUrinary tract infections (UTIs) are common globally, and are developing increased antibiotic resistance. Despite being the diagnostic "gold standard," urine culture is limited by slow results and a high rate of false negative findings, leading to treatment delays, higher costs, and overuse of empirical antibiotics. Our study aims to develop a rapid and reliable model to predict clinical outcomes.
methodsFrom January 1st to October 31st, 2023, we enrolled patients with symptoms suggesting UTI from the Outpatient Department of our hospital. Inclusion criteria were patients aged ≥18, initially diagnosed with UTI, available urinalysis, flow cytometry, and urinary culture. Exclusion criteria included failed sample collection and cultures, and pregnant women. A case-control study was conducted, with UTI cases defined as ≥ 10^5 CFU/ µ L and controls as < 10^5 CFU/ µ L, matched for age and sex in a 1:1 ratio. For validation, retrospective cases from July to December 2022 were selected with matching controls. Using urine culture as the gold standard, the predictive model was developed with backward stepwise logistic regression. Model discrimination was assessed using area under the curve (AUC).
resultsIn our discovery cohort, we included 1,335 UTI cases and 1,282 non-UTI controls, with mean ages of 52.9 ± 17.1 years and 51.9 ± 16.4 years, and females of 76.9% and 77.7%. Using 100 cells/uL as a threshold, bacterial counts demonstrated a sensitivity of 91.0% and specificity of 45.7%. Our novel UTIRisk score, developed from urinalysis and flow cytometry parameters, showed strong discrimination for UTI, with a AUC of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.81-0.84). In the validation cohort, the AUC was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.74-0.80). The UTIRisk score exhibited excellent specificity (96.5%) and high positive predictive value (92.6%). The score performed strongly across subgroups, particularly in males and patients aged ≥65.
conclusionsOur UTIRisk score can improve diagnosis, reduce unnecessary urine cultures, optimize antibiotic use, and help control antibiotic resistance in LMICs. Multicenter, and intervention-based studies are warranted before clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.