Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40366762›Full record

ReviewImmunotherapy2025

Drug evaluation: mepolizumab in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Matheus Rabahi, Ian D Pavord

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immunotherapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Matheus RabahiDepartamento de Pneumologia, Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil.
Ian D PavordRespiratory Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of mortality globally, marked by persistent respiratory symptoms and exacerbations. It is now acknowledged to be a heterogeneous disease with respect to clinical expression and key driving mechanisms. Standard therapies, including bronchodilators and corticosteroids, often fail to adequately control symptoms and exacerbations in patients and there is an important unmet need for new treatments. There has been encouraging progress with biological treatments for patients with COPD and type-2 airway inflammation, a phenotype found in approximately 40% of COPD cases. The first of these, Mepolizumab, is a monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-5 (IL-5), and thereby reducing blood and tissue eosinophil numbers. Here we review the initial clinical trial data with mepolizumab in type-2 high COPD. We suggest that the modest efficacy seen in patients with severe disease may not be reflective of the impact of treatment in patients with active type-2 inflammation and less associated lung and extra-pulmonary damage. We suggest that the way forward is to assess whether clinically important modification of disease course occurs with treatment in patients with high disease activity and low associated damage.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAnimalsClinical Trials as TopicEosinophilsHumansInterleukin-5Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedInterleukin-5mepolizumabbiologic therapyeosinophilic COPDexacerbation reductionIL-5 inhibitionMepolizumabtype-2 inflammation

Identifiers

PMID40366762
PMCPMC12091904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.