ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2025
Detection of Early-Stage Colorectal Cancer Using Cell-Free oncRNA Biomarkers and Artificial Intelligence.
Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bridging the Precancerous Gap in Colorectal Cancer Through AI-Enhanced Liquid Biopsy, Endoscopy, and Digital Pathology.Cancers · 2026Review
- Non-invasive colorectal cancer screening: emerging tools and clinical evidence.Clinical endoscopy · 2026Review
- Rethinking surgical strategy for margin-positive only T1 colorectal cancer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.International journal of colorectal disease · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence models: transforming early diagnosis and precise treatment of gastrointestinal cancers.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Machine learning and multi-omics technologies for precision cardiovascular medicine: advancing diagnosis, risk prediction, and therapeutic guidance.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Advancements in artificial intelligence for cancer diagnosis and prognosis prediction: current applications and emerging opportunities.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeColorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, and early detection significantly improves treatment outcomes, but existing blood-based tests often have limited sensitivity in early-stage disease. We developed a blood-based test combining orphan noncoding RNAs (oncRNA), a group of small cell-free RNAs, with generative artificial intelligence to detect colorectal cancer. EXPERIMENTAL
designWe leveraged a cohort of 613 colorectal cancer cases and controls to train a model that demonstrated both high clinical performance and minimal technical variability in robustness testing. We further validated our model in an independent, single-source cohort of 192 colorectal cancer cases and controls. Model performance was assessed by sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve, with attention to early-stage detection.
resultsIn our independent validation set, we achieved an overall sensitivity of 89% at 90% specificity, with an 80% sensitivity for stage I-an important milestone, as early-stage colorectal cancer detection remains a challenge for other blood-based technologies. Performance was consistent across demographic subgroups.
conclusionsOur oncRNA-based blood test, powered by artificial intelligence, offers strong performance for early colorectal cancer detection, including in stage I disease for which existing blood-based assays are limited. These findings support further development toward a minimally invasive colorectal cancer screening tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.