ArticleJournal of analytical toxicology2025
Comparison of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol in venous and capillary blood following ad libitum cannabis smoking by occasional and daily users.
Article in Journal of analytical toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validation of a microsampling-compatible liquid-liquid extraction method for cannabinoid quantitation in 50 µL of whole blood using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.Journal of analytical toxicology · 2026Article
- Effects of legal-market cannabis and alcohol on verbal learning and memory.Psychopharmacology · 2026Article
- Behavioral phenotypes associated with cannabis and alcohol substitution.Harm reduction journal · 2026Observational
- Cannabis administration is associated with reduced alcohol consumption: Evidence from a novel laboratory co-administration paradigm.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) is the most prominent and main psychoactive cannabinoid found in cannabis. In forensic matters involving cannabis, such as drugged driving or workplace accident investigations, blood Δ9-THC determination is typically required. Venipuncture by a phlebotomist at a medical facility is often the standard blood collection protocol, but this procedure is time consuming and requires specialized training. Capillary blood collection at the site of a transportation or workplace mishap may provide a collection method that is logistically easier and may better reflect blood cannabinoid concentrations at the time of an incident. This study represents the first temporal comparison of the concentration of Δ9-THC and its primary metabolites in venous and capillary blood obtained from users following ad libitum inhalation of contemporary high-concentration cannabis products. Participants provided their own cannabis from a licensed Colorado dispensary and were instructed to smoke or vape ad libitum the amount most used for the desired effect during a 15-minute period. Capillary blood samples collected at the lateral shoulder using the TAP® II microneedle device and standard venipuncture samples at the forearm were collected contemporaneously at baseline and then 10, 30, 60, 90, and 140 minutes after the last inhalation and were analyzed for Δ9-THC, 11-hydroxy-Δ9-THC, and 11-carboxy-Δ9-THC by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Within-subject Δ9-THC concentrations trended lower, often up to 30 to 40%, in contemporaneous capillary blood samples than in venous blood samples until 140 min after cannabis smoking. Concentrations of the Δ9-THC metabolites 11-hydroxy-Δ9-THC and 11-carboxy-Δ9-THC were equivalent at all but the first timepoint after smoking. Due to logistical advantages, capillary blood collection by microneedle devices may be a viable option for qualitative detection of Δ9-THC and its metabolites soon after an incident or a quantitative determination if the samples are collected at least 2 hours after cannabis inhalation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.