ArticleDento maxillo facial radiology2025
Dental imaging in Singapore: a survey of 2D radiographic techniques and CBCT practices.
Article in Dento maxillo facial radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiographic Imaging Use Across Stages of Implant-Supported Rehabilitation: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Evaluating Artificial Intelligence in Full-Arch CBCT Caries Detection: A Comparative Analysis with Clinical Assessment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis survey was conducted to identify dental radiography practices and knowledge gaps among dentists in Singapore with respect to both 2D and 3D imaging.
methodsThis was a cross-sectional survey conducted via an electronic platform from May to June 2023. All Singapore Dental Council-registered dentists were eligible to participate. We gathered data on demographics, intraoral (IO) radiography usage, cone-beam CT (CBCT) training, current CBCT usage, and interpretation.
resultsThree-hundred and five out of 2605 registered dentists completed the online survey (11.7% response rate). Radiograph positioning holders, digital imaging, and round collimation were used by most respondents for IO radiography (85.6%, 88.9%, and 89.2%, respectively). One-hundred and forty-two participants (46.6%) underwent CBCT training, and most lacked training in image acquisition. Dentists expressed interest in CBCT interpretation and the use of viewing software; 219 dentists (71.8%) are CBCT users. Most (74.9%) took 0-5 CBCT scans monthly. Implant planning was the most common indication (24.8%). Among CBCT users, 85.9% report some or all their own scans while 70.7% would engage a reporting service if available.
conclusionsThis survey provides insights in dental imaging that require increased educational efforts in Singapore. For IO radiography, there should be greater emphasis on rectangular collimation. With CBCT, there is potential for training in image acquisition, interpretation, and the use of viewing software. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Identifying knowledge and training gaps in dental imaging is critical to ensure the safe use of ionizing radiation on patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.